Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #152519
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Does the Arcane Training feature of the Encali dwarf automatically give you the Arcane Arcanum spell casting feature? And therefor lock you out of getting another Arcanum?

    In my desired case, in very interested in playing a Encali Ranger (Arcane? + Primal)
    Or would my character end up being a primal spell caster that has access to two wizard cantrips?

    ARCANE TRAINING
    You know two cantrips of your choice from the wizard’s spell list, using Intelligence as your spellcasting ability score. Also, unlike other dwarves, you may gain access to the Arcanum (Spellcasting feature) from a class which casts arcane spells (such as wizard or sorcerer) or any
    archetype which grants arcane spell casting, such as Eldritch Knight.

    Under the MULTICLASSING section
    No character can have access to more than one of the Arcanum.

    #274562
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This raises an interesting question. But my understanding is that once you have Arcane some anywhere you are stuck with Arcane as your only choice. The reason is that the Encali are so closely tied to their beliefs that Arcane is a Gift from Sarish it is anethema to them to start begging the spirits for spells the way rangers do. So the answer is, for now, likely no you can’t be a ranger who is Encali.

    HOWEVER, there is no reason why you can’t be an Encali from the woods who likes to explore things. Consider taking a Rouge with an appropriate background. Rouge is much more variable than “Thief”.

    #274563
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I believe it is supposed to lead into “Sorcerer-Priest” as a source. Will need the full book when it comes out.

    #274565
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Seems like my idea is mute anyway… As I missed the generic dwarf feature which limited them to Divine Arcana instead… No dwarven rangers/Druids can exist for the current sub-races \":(\"

    I think the question still needs to be answered.
    Perhaps cantrips should be excluded from the Arcana rule?

    #274566
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Seems like my idea is mute anyway… As I missed the generic dwarf feature which limited them to Divine Arcana instead… No dwarven rangers/Druids can exist for the current sub-races \":(\"

    I think the question still needs to be answered.
    Perhaps cantrips should be excluded from the Arcana rule?

    Yes, it does seem to still need to be answered because by this reading Encali dwarves cannot be clerics, divine champions, or paladins since they all already have access to arcane spellcasting to begin with, and thus none can have access to divine.

    #274568
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yea, that is good point. Sorcerer Priest is the obvious choice for Encali. I am sure that that and Holy Champion Sarish will fix this.

    #274576
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    By this reading, multiple races would have restrictions based on cantrips that they receive : aka val’Mehans would also be blocked to Divine and Primal classes, Ardakene would only have access to Divine, Kelekene only have access to Arcane, val’Assante only Divine, val’Tensen – etc.

    But I don’t think that that is the intention.

    The way that I feel that the rules are intended:

    Solani Dwarves – Divine Casting classes
    Encali Dwarves – Divine and Arcane Casting classes
    val’Mehan – All classes

    Just because you get a cantrip as a part of your race, does not restrict you only to casting classes related to that cantrip.

    Lucas

    #274577
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    By this reading, multiple races would have restrictions based on cantrips that they receive : aka val’Mehans would also be blocked to Divine and Primal classes, Ardakene would only have access to Divine, Kelekene only have access to Arcane, val’Assante only Divine, val’Tensen – etc.

    But I don’t think that that is the intention.

    The way that I feel that the rules are intended:

    Solani Dwarves – Divine Casting classes
    Encali Dwarves – Divine and Arcane Casting classes
    val’Mehan – All classes

    Just because you get a cantrip as a part of your race, does not restrict you only to casting classes related to that cantrip.

    Lucas

    Yes, I agree that with various bloodline powers this would be a trick situation if they do restrict potential classes. I think it would probably be most easily solved by a statement in the races section about racial powers and talents not counting as spellcasting of a certain type for the purposes of determining compatibility with other types of spellcasting.

    But only if that is actually the intent. If it not the intent though, it should be very clearly spelled out in entries when taking a bloodline talent or when a racial ability prohibits you from taking another type of casting.

    #274579
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Supporting the view that cantrips and racial abilities do not count as an Arcanum (for rules purposes) is the Primer. Important definitions bolded.

    If you are a spell caster you may not utilize either the Magic Initiate or Ritual Caster feat to learn spells from an opposed Arcanum (arcane, divine, or primal) of magic. For example, if you are a wizard you cannot take Ritual Caster to learn divine rituals.

    Choosing these feats also restricts your multiclass options. If you choose to learn a divine spell and cantrips though the Magic Initiate feat you are no longer able to multiclass into any arcane spellcasting class or take an archetype which grants arcane spell casting.

    It appears that characters are not locked until they take one of the classes listed on Pg.45 or either of the above feats.

    Encali still can’t take Druid, Ranger or Warlock (Spirits Patron) due to racial restrictions.

    val’Mehan are still a (conceptual) problem but they don’t actually get the Ritual Caster feat for their blood power, working around the listed Arcanum restriction. However, if they are not taking Sorcerer-Priest as their source, the PC should be burned at the stake as a heretic anyway.

    #274586
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The question of how racially granted cantrips and spells affects multiclassing is a great one! I hope to have an answer for you soon. I have some ideas of how I think it should work but experience has taught me that research is required before I just post things \":lol:\"

    I will make an official post about this before the end of the month.

    #275190
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    To expand on this question slightly, do any of these racial elements trigger the Hunted by Ymandragore trait (hereafter HbY)?

    Encali Dwarves specifically have “Arcane” Training. Val’Mehan cast Wizard rituals and Wizard/Warlock cantrips. Kelekene cast Fire Bolt (an Arcane cantrip). Are all these races HbY based on race even if they otherwise mundane?

    If taking Magic Initiate or Ritual Caster for Wizard locks you into the Arcane side of the Arcanum, does it also trigger the HbY trait too?

    What about classes that don’t mention the trait, are not traditional spellcasters, but get spells like Totem Barbarian or Monk of the Four Elements? Totem Barbarian would probably be Primal anyway, but MotFE certainly uses their Ki to manifest otherwise Arcane spells. Are any of these classes HbY despite not having the Spellcasting class feature?

    #275191
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    To expand on this question slightly, do any of these racial elements trigger the Hunted by Ymandragore trait (hereafter HbY)?

    Encali Dwarves specifically have “Arcane” Training. Val’Mehan cast Wizard rituals and Wizard/Warlock cantrips. Kelekene cast Fire Bolt (an Arcane cantrip). Are all these races HbY based on race even if they otherwise mundane?

    If taking Magic Initiate or Ritual Caster for Wizard locks you into the Arcane side of the Arcanum, does it also trigger the HbY trait too?

    What about classes that don’t mention the trait, are not traditional spellcasters, but get spells like Totem Barbarian or Monk of the Four Elements? Totem Barbarian would probably be Primal anyway, but MotFE certainly uses their Ki to manifest otherwise Arcane spells. Are any of these classes HbY despite not having the Spellcasting class feature?

    That has a lot of points in it. I’m no one official. So I can’t answer that. But I can tell you that Harvester can go after anyone they want. Just because you don’t have Hunted by Ymandragore doesn’t mean you are safe.
    In the past, Harvesters captured many things.
    1) an entire Enclave of Dwarves (some were experimented on, some worked using their gifts for making wondrous items, and some became Harvesters themselves.)
    2) Dwarf soul shards belonging to strong Arcane users
    3) Val Psionists
    4) Elorii (for study of their immortality and elemental nature)
    5) arcane magical creatures, divine beings, and infernals have all been captured or in service before.
    Basically any magic in any form, a person, an item, or an exotic active spell, could be of interest to them.

    To me Harvesters and Ymandragore has always been the boogeyman that everyone knows about. They come at any time and take what they want, you don’t get told why. Sure there have been some push back against them, some quite spectacular, but no one nation or race can be said to be a threat to Ymandragore, so everyone (including heroes) lives in fear of them.
    Hunted by Ymandragore means you know you have a target on your back.
    It doesn’t help that there is so many factors, so you don’t know if you are dealing with a rogue Harvester, or if this is a sanctioned incursion onto the main land.

    #275195
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    While all that is true, and Harvesters in any particular mod may go after any of those groups, there are specific rules attached to the HbY trait.

    People with that trait must track their Harvester notice points, possibly triggering a Harvesting encounter. People with that trait are taken if the encounter goes poorly while others are merely “left for dead.”

    Add the already mentioned multiclassing restrictions certainly make this something that needs further guidance.

    #275198
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Wow, I’m sorry this fell off my radar. There are a lot of good questions here and I will delve into them when I’m not on my phone at lunch. More info coming before Origins.

    #275208
    frootsnax
    Participant

    No one official, but this is my take:

    Sorcerer-Priests have never been targeted in the past and are not now targeted in the A:RPG rule set. While this could maybe change in 5E I wouldn’t expect it too. I believe that SP is “divine enough” that if your faith in Sarish is broken, then you can’t effectively cast spells. Which would make them of little use to the aisle. And … If nothing else Loshnek seems to spend a goodly amount of time in a Cold Peace monitoring the Isle of Tears and its “Tyrant” … and I believe he likely gets irritated when harvesters remove “his pawns.”

    Using a feat to tap into arcane IMO should also attract the attention of Harvesters.

    IMO Val Mehan should not be Hunted for gaining cantrips/spells through bloodline abilities. It’s mostly biological and (IMO) there are no potential breakthroughs there on the road to immortality. (Maybe once upon a time there were, but capturing and “eating” a valinor has to trump this to the umpteeth degree).

    I think the Encali are the toughest to offer an opinion on. It seems their magic is learned and not inate. That argues that Ymandragore might be interested in them if they were Eldritch casters. That said I believe Sorcerer-Priests are not hunted. So if their powers come out of the SP tradition (which seems possible) then I believe they aren’t widely hunted.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • The forum ‘Living Arcanis 5E Rulings’ is closed to new topics and replies.