Makers of Award-winning Role Playing Games › Forums › Arcanis: The Shattered Empires › Arcanis: Rules & Rulings › Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion › advanced martial techniques multiple dice (Please Dont use)
- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- March 21, 2014 at 4:42 pm #151031AnonymousInactive
Page 256 (Errata) Under the rules for creating an advanced maneuver add the following line to the Effects: entry (shown in Bold)
Effects:
The effects of both maneuvers are combined. Single Target maneuver effects are applied to all Targets when combined with a multiple Target maneuver. If two maneuvers which grant Attribute) die are combined the new maneuver only retains one of its attribute die (player’s choice) at a +2
bonus. If one of the maneuvers granted multiple attribute die increase the bonus to +6Devastating Blow (T4) & Strike without Thought (T5)
Moment of Prescience(T5) and Deadeye shot (t4)
Are the only examples of this I cant find, and really nerf Moment of Prescience.
I don’t understand this change and I don’t support it.
March 21, 2014 at 4:44 pm #260560AnonymousInactiveit’s not staying
it’s getting edited out.
looking at a universal rule that covers all multiple attribute die
March 21, 2014 at 4:51 pm #260568AnonymousInactiveProposal (With clarification on TWF in Bold)
Effects:
The effects of both maneuvers are combined. Single Target maneuver effects are applied to all Targets when combined with a multiple Target maneuver. If a Multiple Target Maneuver is combined with a Two-Weapon Fighting Maneuver, only the first attack applies to all Targets. If two maneuvers which grant Attribute) die are combined, exploding damage may only applied from one of the Attribute dice. If multiple Attribute Dice explode, you may choose the Attribute die you want to reroll.March 21, 2014 at 4:54 pm #260572AnonymousInactiveJohn thats a new rules suggestion change, and you should start a new topic for it
March 21, 2014 at 4:54 pm #260573AnonymousInactiveNot a change, just clarifying the intent as it’s always been communicated to everyone.
March 21, 2014 at 5:06 pm #260577AnonymousInactiveright but this is about multiple dice
HERE let me do it for you
March 21, 2014 at 6:02 pm #260593AnonymousInactiveIt’s the same errata entry.
March 21, 2014 at 6:10 pm #260595AnonymousInactivePete or another moderator please lock and remove this thread, I’ve started a separate thread for John issue and I’ll restart this one along the lines of dice exploding
- AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.