Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150961
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Any correction for Illiir granting no special power option with sanctify weapon?

    #259673
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Any correction for Illiir granting no special power option with sanctify weapon?

    ::face palm::

    you know I had that in my notes and totally missed including it in the errata?

    I’ll add it, thanks for the heads up!

    #259722
    drafit
    Participant

    Hello,

    Any correction for Illiir granting no special power option with sanctify weapon?

    No, this is not being errated.

    The reason: The religious knowledge of the Known Lands is incomplete. All of the hymns, dogma and Cants have been cobbled together from a myriad of sources.

    And thus far, the Cant for the Illiirite version of this divine effect has not been rediscovered.

    So, no Illiirite version of Sanctify Weapon.

    “Emerald Society and Azure Way members, your mission, if you decide to accept it is…”

    #260336
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I must say, I find that odd. After all, we’ve seen at least three active valinor (or fallen valinor) of Illiir who could teach these cants, right? All of these three have been pretty darn active. (though one was just ruling his little city state in the sealed land for most the time) I can maybe see Menatas (sp?) not promoting Illiir near the end there, since he was really more about promoting himself. But wouldn’t the Voice of Illiir spread Illiirite cants? Previously you’ve said the Church of Illiir in Bastion was the only real church since Xabal could only teach them Illiirite cants. Do they (and thus Val illirites from Bastion) know these cants? It would seem to me that at least they would have a complete Illirrite (and only Illiirite) lexicon.

    #260338
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    we have?, I do say I think your mistaken on who / what we have seen

    Manetas, had his own thing and did not reveal himself as a Valinor, besides that was 50+ years ago, “we” havent seen him.

    Xabal, I recall something about the cants of Illir being weird in the unsealed lands, but it doesnt matter since the unsealed lands religion is distinctly separate from our own, and while they may know that cant, its not available for players.

    what other Valinor of Illir are you referring to?

    #260339
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    we have?, I do say I think your mistaken on who / what we have seen

    Manetas, had his own thing and did not reveal himself as a Valinor, besides that was 50+ years ago, “we” havent seen him.

    Xabal, I recall something about the cants of Illir being weird in the unsealed lands, but it doesnt matter since the unsealed lands religion is distinctly separate from our own, and while they may know that cant, its not available for players.

    what other Valinor of Illir are you referring to?

    In the lifetime of the mother church is relevant, not just this lifetime, so even 50 years ago is very relevant. I didn’t play back then, so my knowledge is fuzzy, but it was my impression that for generations Menetas was active, and building his power, which at least in the beginning was probably associated with supporting the worshippers of Illiir that thought of him as Illiir’s servant on earth (or Illiir himself). But stuff with him is odd, so it is also distinctly possible that he did not share knowledge like that. But wasn’t he opposed by a Val that possessed the current Matriarch or something? The “Voice of Illiir”?

    then there is Xabal. I would understand why their teachings haven’t spread out into the wider populace yet, but we will be having some Val’Vasik joining us shortly, and I at least was planning on making mine an Illiite. So it would seem that at least some of their teachings should be entering the campaign shortly. So what was known there does need to be dealt with.

    #260340
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    we have?, I do say I think your mistaken on who / what we have seen

    Manetas, had his own thing and did not reveal himself as a Valinor, besides that was 50+ years ago, “we” havent seen him.

    Xabal, I recall something about the cants of Illir being weird in the unsealed lands, but it doesnt matter since the unsealed lands religion is distinctly separate from our own, and while they may know that cant, its not available for players.

    what other Valinor of Illir are you referring to?

    In the lifetime of the mother church is relevant, not just this lifetime, so even 50 years ago is very relevant. I didn’t play back then, so my knowledge is fuzzy, but it was my impression that for generations Menetas was active, and building his power, which at least in the beginning was probably associated with supporting the worshippers of Illiir that thought of him as Illiir’s servant on earth (or Illiir himself). But stuff with him is odd, so it is also distinctly possible that he did not share knowledge like that. But wasn’t he opposed by a Val that possessed the current Matriarch or something? The “Voice of Illiir”? Wouldn’t that (not fallen?) Val have Illiriite teachings to teach?

    then there is Xabal. I would understand why their teachings haven’t spread out into the wider populace yet, but we will be having some Val’Vasik joining us shortly, and I at least was planning on making mine an Illiite. So it would seem that at least some of their teachings should be entering the campaign shortly. So what was known there does need to be dealt with.

    #260341
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    In the lifetime of the mother church is relevant, not just this lifetime, so even 50 years ago is very relevant. I didn’t play back then, so my knowledge is fuzzy, but it was my impression that for generations Menetas was active, and building his power, which at least in the beginning was probably associated with supporting the worshippers of Illiir that thought of him as Illiir’s servant on earth (or Illiir himself). But stuff with him is odd, so it is also distinctly possible that he did not share knowledge like that. But wasn’t he opposed by a Val that possessed the current Matriarch or something? The “Voice of Illiir”?

    RE Manetas, he was not operating in the open, he was very certainly working from behind the scenes, rather than out in the open. he certainly would not have gone up to someone in the chech saying “here is the canticle your missing”

    The Word of Illir (Numenah iirc as described in the Spear of the Loghin) I’m not sure if the effect that possessed Ellandre, and the Valinor named The Word of Illir are the same thing. Regardless if they are or not, the effects of what happened to Elandre have caused the resurgence of “orthodox ideals” causing the current conflict within the mother church… there might be something there if people choose to listen to Ellandre.

    #260347
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just because Illiirite Valinor have been in the story, doesn’t mean they give up their knowledge to anyone.

    #260350
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    There’s also the Love of Illiir, who would presumably have been most likely to share such… but we don’t know anything about it before it arrived at the Citadel in the Blessed Lands, or what happened to it afterwards…

    #260379
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Honestly I think you would want to include it just to make the book complete so people that are using the product for home play ect. have the official rules. If Henry wants to keep it as a quest type discovery for secret societies to discover great! But couldn’t that be addressed in the Campaign Documents or announcements or what not? I would just like to have the knowledge of what it should be to make the book complete.

    ~Tony

    #260385
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I disagree. Even in your home game the priest of Illiir don’t know what the Sanctified Rune of Illiir is. In your home game if you want to give Illiir a sanc rune, go ahead. Pick one that fits him and apply it. But leaving it out of the book makes story sense.

    #260405
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I disagree. Even in your home game the priest of Illiir don’t know what the Sanctified Rune of Illiir is. In your home game if you want to give Illiir a sanc rune, go ahead. Pick one that fits him and apply it. But leaving it out of the book makes story sense.

    Well, the weird thing is that there is a blessed rune of Illiir in the “Treasures of the Ages” suppliment, and I would think the two would be related in some way, but apparently we know the rune, but not the specific power from the spell sanctify weapon for Illiir, despite valinor of Illiir being the most commonly seen valinor in the game (as far as I can tell).

    And I Would think it would be in most valinor’s interest to promote the following and followers of their god with such information.

    #260411
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    And I Would think it would be in most valinor’s interest to promote the following and followers of their god with such information.

    It is in the followers of a religions best interest to understand ALL of what Illiir told mankind some 5,000 years ago, yet for some reason no Valinor showed up to give the Mother Church a brand new copy of “How to be a Human, by Illiir” like he (apparently) did at the dawn of the First Imperium.

    Now why could that be? \";)\"

    #260424
    frootsnax
    Participant

    And I Would think it would be in most valinor’s interest to promote the following and followers of their god with such information.

    It is in the followers of a religions best interest to understand ALL of what Illiir told mankind some 5,000 years ago, yet for some reason no Valinor showed up to give the Mother Church a brand new copy of “How to be a Human, by Illiir” like he (apparently) did at the dawn of the First Imperium.

    Now why could that be? \";)\"

    When the gods took off the instructions they left to the Valinor were to stay and witness the glory of mankind. Witnessing is a pretty passive action. Xabal bucked those orders to help humanity and look what it got him …

    It does seem like a weird hole that Sanctify Weapon lacks an Illir specific option, but given that Henry has opined here, its clearly not a typo or unintentional omission…

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.