• This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #152475
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi,
    Had a quick skim on my copy and looks like a few syntax typos made it through editing. I’ll add them here as I get time.

    Little things like “do” should be “do not” in a few places.

    #274208
    drafit
    Participant

    Hello,

    Yep, little mistakes like that can be missed on review.

    Please send me an email with whatever you find to PCIHenry@gmail.com

    Thank you and I hope you enjoy the book.

    Henry

    #274819
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    When a spell from a scroll is used to “charge” a Sorcery rune, does it consume the scroll as it the spell were cast from the scroll?

    #274835
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can 5E Armor Runes be inscribed onto clothing, or must it be ‘armor’?

    #275156
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    When a spell from a scroll is used to “charge” a Sorcery rune, does it consume the scroll as it the spell were cast from the scroll?

    Yes, using the scroll in that way is like casting the spell. So it would consume the scroll.

    #275157
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can 5E Armor Runes be inscribed onto clothing, or must it be ‘armor’?

    That’s a good question, and the wording in FiM says that ‘one mundane item’ has 3 rune slots, but each rune only has functions listed for armor and sometimes shields. That means that the magic of the rune only takes hold when inscribed on an armor or a shield. When inscribed onto clothing, the rune looks lovely but does nothing.

    As runesmiths improve their craft and artisans improve their skills and gain access to new materials, it is possible that an effect for clothing could be discovered for certain runes. Then once those runes are inscribed on clothing they would have an effect. But for now, such effects do not exist.

    #275178
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The reason for the question is that ARG has already ruled ‘clothing’ = ‘armour’ for runes.

    5E hasn’t made that distinction yet.

    #275180
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The reason for the question is that ARG has already ruled ‘clothing’ = ‘armour’ for runes.

    5E hasn’t made that distinction yet.

    We can definitely review that distinction and see if it makes sense in 5e. With the way the bounded accuracy system works, I’m hesitant about opening up runes to clothing. But it’s something we can certainly review.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The forum ‘Living Arcanis 5E Rulings’ is closed to new topics and replies.