Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150401
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I remember on the old forums there was a discussion about the weapon trick, “Grasp the Blade”. (specifically, what it meant to “negate” an attack.) Does anyone remember what the consensus was? (Or if a consensus was ever reached?)

    Thanks,
    Scott

    #253296
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    sorry Scott i don’t remember the discussion at all, can you give us the gist of the issue? (or is it what does Negate an attack” actually mean?

    #253298
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I believe it was just treated as if they’d missed. That’s the way it remains simple and straight forward.
    John

    #253300
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    sorry Scott i don’t remember the discussion at all, can you give us the gist of the issue? (or is it what does Negate an attack” actually mean?Essentially, the question is, “what does it mean to negate an attack?”

    Does the attacker suffer all the normal speed and recovery (if any) from his attack, it just automatically misses? (Or does this work kind of like counterspell where the attacker can just do it again 1 tick later?)

    If the attacker used a limited resource, like a smite ability, is the usage still used up?

    stuff like that.

    I believe it was just treated as if they’d missed. That’s the way it remains simple and straight forward.I hope that’s the answer, for simplicity’s sake. But I couldn’t remember and wanted to see if anyone else could.

    Scott

    #253301
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I cant see any reason why that wouldn’t be the answer

    #253379
    frootsnax
    Participant

    All the attack choices are made. Then you negate the attack. I assume smites etc are wasted and that speed and recovery apply to the attacker.

    #253457
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That’s what I remember as well: all the relevant costs were paid or expended and then it had no effect (otherwise you expend your grasp the blade and the guy who was smiting you just does it again the next tick)

    #253694
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Correct,

    It’s as if they missed the attack… the attacker still pays all the speed and recovery for the failed attack…

    Yes.. it can suck, a lot.. but you committed to the attack with all the “gusto” you would have if you would have it, as such, you suffer the full speed and recovery of that attack.

    #253708
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The big question is (and I assume the answer is yes) does using grasp the blade negate the attack for all potential targets? So if a big bad used sweeping strike and you used grasp the blade, the entire attack is negated.

    John

    #253710
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It’s as if they missed the attack

    John, I’m going to go with no

    #253714
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If it were my table, I’d say yes. Picture, if you will, Bad Guy #1 performing a sweeping strike on three targets: A, B and C.

    B is wearing a gauntlet and wants to push his click by 3 to Grasp the blade. Originally, I was going to suggest that the attack on A would proceed as normal and when the bad buy gets to B, the grasp the blade goes off and, if successful, negates the attack, thus ending it for both B and C. But then I thought about it… If you’re going to push your clock to pre-emptively “grasp the blade” and negate the attack, why would you wait until after the blade cuts into your buddy? If it were just you, you’d be stepping into the attack and grabbing the weapon, thus preventing the attack as it’s just beginning. So I see no reason why that wouldn’t work with a sweeping strike as well. Visually, I see it working just the same. So at my tables, barring a ruling otherwise, it will work.

    Scott

    #253715
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The big question is (and I assume the answer is yes) does using grasp the blade negate the attack for all potential targets? So if a big bad used sweeping strike and you used grasp the blade, the entire attack is negated.

    John

    to keep things simple. I would say yes.. because you don’t choose who you attack 1st

    #253867
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sweeping strike is also a single attack from my understanding of it, it just happens to target multiple people (now if it was called multi-swing that’s a different idea) so one attack with one negation…
    1-1=0

    #253868
    frootsnax
    Participant

    Sweeping strike is also a single attack from my understanding of it, it just happens to target multiple people (now if it was called multi-swing that’s a different idea) so one attack with one negation…
    1-1=0

    IMO totally irrelevant.

    If you gasp their blade you have it till you either choose to let go or the attacker takes a push 2 action to pull it free. The attacker can’t take the push action on their turn, so attacks with *that* weapon are done at that point. If you are flowing sand or whatever I also believe you also either have to leave that weapon behind or stop moving. I don’t think you’d use Grasp the Blade every fight, but its a good trick to have when you do want it.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • The forum ‘Arcanis: Rules & Rulings’ is closed to new topics and replies.