Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #152402
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dark-kin can and Ss’erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

    How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

    Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?

    #273733
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dark-kin can and Ss’erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

    How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

    Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?

    By the standard 5e rules, they stack. Not sure if any changes might come for Arcanis 5e regarding this matter.

    #273735
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Dark-kin can and Ss’erressen do have natural armor as a racial feature.

    How does this stack, or work with class features like Unarmored Defense from Barbarian or Monk?

    Do they overlap for the most benefit or is it one or the other?

    By the standard 5e rules, they stack. Not sure if any changes might come for Arcanis 5e regarding this matter.

    So.. because one is a racial natural armor bonus and feature, it doesn’t conflict with the unarmored defense class feature? Thats what i’m getting when i read them. I’m just confirming.

    Edit:

    They do not stack. http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/feature … nuary-2016

    #273736
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Edit:

    They do not stack. http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/feature … nuary-2016

    Interesting, this change was made at the beginning of the year as previously this wasn’t the case. Glad you brought this up and serves me as a reminder to check the rulings more often than once a year \":lol:\"

    It should be noted though that a Dark-kin’s bestial hide isn’t Natural Armor (as per the definition of the 5e D&D rules, though it does appear to fit more inline with the Sorcerer’s Draconic Resilience).

    Hmm, I wonder if this means the Arcanis gawdz that be will re-take a look at Dark-kin’s Bestial Hide or keep it as concurrent to the 5e ruling you just linked.

    #273738
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer’s feature.

    #273743
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Interesting, this change was made at the beginning of the year as previously this wasn’t the case. Glad you brought this up and serves me as a reminder to check the rulings more often than once a year \":lol:\"

    It should be noted though that a Dark-kin’s bestial hide isn’t Natural Armor (as per the definition of the 5e D&D rules, though it does appear to fit more inline with the Sorcerer’s Draconic Resilience).

    Hmm, I wonder if this means the Arcanis gawdz that be will re-take a look at Dark-kin’s Bestial Hide or keep it as concurrent to the 5e ruling you just linked.

    If I had to guess, this rule clarification is meant to reduce the no armor wearing, high AC crowd. I mean just as a first level black talon monk in 5th ed, with the racial natural armor, an dex of 16 and a wis of 14, my AC would be 18! 18 is platemail level of defense. So going off the armor in the players handbook 16-18 is very decent AC.

    Which is why I was skeptical if they stacked, it seemed to good to be true, and it was. \":(\"

    When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer’s feature.

    Hm. Are you saying, you think they will change the racial natural armor benefits for Arcanis 5th edition because of this rules change? Or just commenting on its original intention?

    #273744
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Compliance with ‘core rules’ as much as possible should occur with the campaign book.

    I would think a rules sidebar in the campaign book saying “Bestial Hide follows all the rules for the Sorcerer’s Draconic Resilience to reflect the infernal source of the ability” may appear.

    #273753
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If I had to guess, this rule clarification is meant to reduce the no armor wearing, high AC crowd. I mean just as a first level black talon monk in 5th ed, with the racial natural armor, an dex of 16 and a wis of 14, my AC would be 18! 18 is platemail level of defense. So going off the armor in the players handbook 16-18 is very decent AC.

    Which is why I was skeptical if they stacked, it seemed to good to be true, and it was. \":(\"

    I hear ya. Prior reading this ruling, my Dark-kin Barb was running around with AC 19 (Bestial Hide, 14 Dex, 16 Con, +Shield). Now, he’ll be a 17 w/shield. Not too shabby for someone wearing no armor at lv. 1.

    That being said, Dex based Ss’ressen are still pretty BOSS *nods*

    #273760
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Both the dark-kin and ss’ressen racial features are modeled after the Draconic Resilience class feature so they work that way. They don’t stack with any other forms of armor but do work with shields. When the full 5e Arcanis book is released, these class features may be revised but currently that is how they work.

    #273762
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    When written, Bestial Hide was meant to reflect the sorcerer’s feature.

    Hm. Are you saying, you think they will change the racial natural armor benefits for Arcanis 5th edition because of this rules change? Or just commenting on its original intention?

    Commenting on the original intention. I wrote Bestial Hide to reflect the wording of Draconic Resilience, because with 5e math you can’t have race adding to AC; it throws everything off and makes that race too powerful.

    #273765
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    5e, at its core, is controlled by something they call “bound accuracy”

    Natural Armor, Armor, Spells which grant AC, and Armor like abilities from classes do not stack.

    You simply apply the best one.

    #273771
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Commenting on the original intention. I wrote Bestial Hide to reflect the wording of Draconic Resilience, because with 5e math you can’t have race adding to AC; it throws everything off and makes that race too powerful.

    Ah, I had not thought of natural armor causing such havoc within the rules, but a lot of things in 5e are strange. I enjoy the game and yet at the same time miss some aspects of older additions.

    #273773
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Natural Armor, Armor, Spells which grant AC, and Armor like abilities from classes do not stack.

    Curious. Dark’kin’s Bestial hide trait isn’t, as per how 5e rules are written, considered Natural armor (fits more along the lines of the Sorcerer’s Draconic Resilience ability, but isn’t a class feature, instead being a racial one). Does this mean it stacks (or the intention being that the racial trait is meant to be a Natural Armor)?

    #273778
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    What Pedro was essentially saying is that you only get one method of determining your AC. For example, a Monk/Barbarian can use either the Monk’s method or the Barbarian’s. Everything that provides AC either provides a formula, or sets your AC at a specific value. There are very few bonuses in 5e in general, and especially AC bonuses, the Defense fighting style being one notable bonus.

    #273799
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    From official errata

    A bonus always gets added when the game instructs you to add it, unless you’re already receiving the bonus from a game feature with same name. Don’t confuse a bonus to AC (such as +2) with an AC calculation (AC = 10 + your Dexterity modifier + your Constitution modifier). AC calculations don’t stack with each other. Bonuses do.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • The forum ‘Living Arcanis 5E Rulings’ is closed to new topics and replies.