Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150964
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Staves is the plural of Staff

    a Rune Staff, is a “quarterstaff like weapon”

    quarterstaff is a 2 handed Unbalanced Melee weapon

    I assume you have to wield the Runestaff to use it, but since its a two handed weapon, how is that possible?

    #259744
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Staves is the plural of Staff

    a Rune Staff, is a “quarterstaff like weapon”

    quarterstaff is a 2 handed Unbalanced Melee weapon

    I assume you have to wield the Runestaff to use it, but since its a two handed weapon, how is that possible?

    you have totally lost me

    #259745
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you cant cast when you have both of your hands occupied can you?

    #259749
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you cant cast when you have both of your hands occupied can you?

    no you need two hands to use it as a weapon… to cast spells when holding it and pulling upon it’s wand runes.. you don’t

    quick hands can help though..

    #259753
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    yeah that actually needs to be a rule somewhere…. because there is no difference in using it as a wand compared to when its being used as a weapon as far as the rules are written

    #259759
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I would propose that to cast the spells that are in the staff, that it be possible even without Quick Hands. It seems harsh to force a talent to use a magical item specifically created to be used that way.

    Now if they want to wield the staff as a weapon and cast their normal spells, then yes, Quick Hands could be needed. Or you can rule and say wielding the Runestave provides the necessary somatic components.

    John

    #259775
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ John I had totally forgotten there were staves that contained spells, your points are salient and correct, i have no argument with them.

    I was trying to address the idea of runestaff being the equivalent of using a wand. I agree that the idea of taking a talent to use them in that fashion is a bit excessive, I would personally prefer to see something along the lines of “Runestaves when used as weapons must be wielded as a normal quarterstaff, however when using the Runestaff to cast spells, you only need to hold it in one hand. you may swap between using a runestaff as weapon and to assist spell casting as a trivial action.

    this discussion makes me think of two additional things, one a rune staff is a great example of a another hybrid thing (weapon and wand) and that the rules that apply to shield should apply similarly to a rune staff.

    and do wands count as a free hand or does a caster that uses a wand have to have an empty hand and a wand wielding hand?

    #259791
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    and do wands count as a free hand or does a caster that uses a wand have to have an empty hand and a wand wielding hand?

    That’s a great question. I would hope that as a ‘focus’ for casting, a hand holding a wand can also be used to cast spells.

    John

    #259845
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I would propose that to cast the spells that are in the staff, that it be possible even without Quick Hands. It seems harsh to force a talent to use a magical item specifically created to be used that way.

    Now if they want to wield the staff as a weapon and cast their normal spells, then yes, Quick Hands could be needed. Or you can rule and say wielding the Runestave provides the necessary somatic components.

    John

    Dude you can hold a stick one handed and not swing it…

    I’m just saying….

    want to use it as a weapon AND a wand… well quick hands or spend speed 2 actions

    #259847
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    and do wands count as a free hand or does a caster that uses a wand have to have an empty hand and a wand wielding hand?

    Yep, that was the intent…

    #259848
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    intent really doesnt count for much when there isnt a shred of rules to support the intent

    #259874
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    intent really doesnt count for much when there isnt a shred of rules to support the intent

    I just read over the rules…

    going to errata it in the morning…

    #259896
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    and do wands count as a free hand or does a caster that uses a wand have to have an empty hand and a wand wielding hand?

    Yep, that was the intent…
    Which was the intent?

    Dude you can hold a stick one handed and not swing it…

    I’m just saying….

    want to use it as a weapon AND a wand… well quick hands or spend speed 2 actionsA runestaff is a two-handed weapon. So you can either caster through it like a wand or you can’t cast at all with it like any other two-handed weapon.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • The forum ‘Harvesters Internal’ is closed to new topics and replies.