Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150981
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Both of these abilities are too powerful as written. If you recover a single arrow or dagger you can do the whole maneuver again. My recommendation would be to write it something similar to the following:

    Effect: Weapon; you may throw a single dagger at each Target within range. At least once per scene as long as you’re armed, regardless of the amount of daggers you currently possess, you always have enough normal daggers to perform this Weapon Trick. If you’ve already used the ability to hit more targets than you have daggers, you may use this ability again selecting targets with the daggers you have remaining.

    Darken the Sky should have the same sort of limitation.

    With a sweep of his hat,

    Paul

    #259865
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Both of these abilities are too powerful as written. If you recover a single arrow or dagger you can do the whole maneuver again. My recommendation would be to write it something similar to the following:

    Effect: Weapon; you may throw a single dagger at each Target within range. At least once per scene as long as you’re armed, regardless of the amount of daggers you currently possess, you always have enough normal daggers to perform this Weapon Trick. If you’ve already used the ability to hit more targets than you have daggers, you may use this ability again selecting targets with the daggers you have remaining.

    Darken the Sky should have the same sort of limitation.

    With a sweep of his hat,

    Paul

    Will add to the next errata pass after this one is completed

    #259891
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Darken the Sky is a Tier FIVE trick… I would argue that it’s fine as written, given the Tier requirement. Steel Rain is merely Tier 3

    #259922
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m confused why the re-wording is necessary? For both, you need the right number of daggers/arrows to attack all the eligible targets, except once / scene you can do it cinematically even if you possess only 1.

    John

    #259947
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think adding this restriction needlessly limits the trick

    #259984
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m of the mind to keep it the same…

    at most I’ll add a fate point expenditure to the 1/Scene ability

    #259998
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So ‘the same’ is: You can use these abilities as many times as you want but with only as many ‘daggers’ or ‘arrows’ as you currently posses. In addition, you may perform this once / scene as long as you have 1 dagger or arrow?

    John

    #260002
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m of the mind to keep it the same…

    at most I’ll add a fate point expenditure to the 1/Scene ability
    I strongly dislike needing to use a fate point to use a weapon trick… There’s no such restriction on other tricks.

    #260019
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m of the mind to keep it the same…

    at most I’ll add a fate point expenditure to the 1/Scene ability
    I strongly dislike needing to use a fate point to use a weapon trick… There’s no such restriction on other tricks.

    I believe it’s use a Fate Point to use it more than once / scene if you don’t have enough munition to perform it. If I’m wrong, then I agree that the trick should work as written as long as you have enough arrows/daggers to perform it.

    John

    #260025
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’m of the mind to keep it the same…

    at most I’ll add a fate point expenditure to the 1/Scene ability
    I strongly dislike needing to use a fate point to use a weapon trick… There’s no such restriction on other tricks.

    I believe it’s use a Fate Point to use it more than once / scene if you don’t have enough munition to perform it. If I’m wrong, then I agree that the trick should work as written as long as you have enough arrows/daggers to perform it.

    John
    If the fate point is ignore ammo, I’m fine with it… That would be a generally acceptable use of a fate point – ‘oh look, I DO have more ammo’

    #260045
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If the fate point is ignore ammo, I’m fine with it… That would be a generally acceptable use of a fate point – ‘oh look, I DO have more ammo’

    Yep.. that’s the idea

    Oh look, I forgot I had this backup quiver…

    #260048
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    the entirety of the maneuver is supposed to be cinematic, I think the idea would be to deplete the ammunition for every actual attack made.

    all of this fate stuff seems superfluous to me

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.