Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #150990
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Speed & Strain: Reviewing both the speed and strain values of the both base spells; apply the highest value as the spell’s Speed +1 and the second highest value as the spells Strain +1.

    I still believe this is not a good way to combine the spells. In many cases you could combine 2 spells designed to be very quick but also designed to strain you more. As an example, combining 2 spells that have Speed: 1 (6) into an advanced spell would give you a spell of 7 (7), making an interruptible spell out of 2 spells designed to be quickly cast. A better solution that keeps the spirit of the 2 spells is:

    Speed & Strain: The Speed of the advanced spell is the highest speed cost of either base spell +1. The Strain of the advanced spell is the highest strain cost of either base spell +1.

    John

    #260047
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Speed & Strain: The Speed of the advanced spell is the highest speed cost of either base spell +1. The Strain of the advanced spell is the highest strain cost of either base spell +1.

    I like this solution better

    #260066
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I had thought of that originally

    it quickly made advancing base spells completely obsolete….

    combining and advanced spell and advancing a base spell should both be a viable option…

    Combine a few spells your way and advance some spells.. you will see you get a lot more bang for your buck when you combine things the way you propose.

    #260068
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Pedro I know it , but we keep rehashing all the differnt ways to do this and i think taking the 2 worst numbers out of the mix not the most effective, because you end up with things that were orginally strain as speed and it just doesnt make sense

    #260082
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    it quickly made advancing base spells completely obsolete….
    I respectfully disagree… The proposed method makes combined spells obsolete…

    #260084
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why did we move away from Highest Speed + 1/2 Lowest Speed and Highest Strain + 1/2 Lowest Strain?

    John

    #260090
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @devin dunno

    I liked the last iteration of:
    Use the slowest Spell’s Speed cost and apply the faster Spell’s Speed or Strain (whichever is higher) cost as additional Strain. In cases which both spells possess the same Speed, use the spell with the highest Strain as your Base Spell.

    #260142
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    it quickly made advancing base spells completely obsolete….

    I respectfully disagree… The proposed method makes combined spells obsolete…

    Some combinations, yes.. some combinations just got a kick in the head…

    while other combinations work very well…

    what it does is limit the mixing of slow spells with slow spells or spells with super high strain (which was meant to curtail some mixes in the first place)

    I have also been considering taking away the final +1 to each so it’s just the highest speed/strain (maybe swamping the highest value to strain)

    #260143
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    your gonna have to expand on that some more there pedro

    #260145
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Current version (updated)

    Speed & Strain: Reviewing both the speed and strain values of the both base spells; apply the highest value as the spell’s Strain and the second highest value as the spells Speed

    #260150
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This still results in nonsensical combinations of 2 spells meant to be fast but high strain into an interruptible spell with high speed and high strain. That makes no sense to me.

    Pedro can you find some examples of where High Speed + 1 (High Strain +1) results in spells vastly superior to adapted spells?

    John

    #260155
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Pedro, would you accept
    Take the higher of the spells 2 speeds and add their strain together?

    i think keeping the speeds as speed and strain as strain is important

    #260162
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    i think keeping the speeds as speed and strain as strain is important

    I feel the same.

    John

    #260192
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Pedro can you find some examples of where High Speed + 1 (High Strain +1) results in spells vastly superior to adapted spells?

    Elemental Bolt/Arc Lighting – 4 (+2) /4 (+2)
    becomes 5 (+3)
    Melee (1 target)
    2d6 (Primary)+2

    to get Arc Lighting to do the same damage you need to apply the damage boost 3 times
    for CTN: +9, Strain +3 final cost of 4 (+5) and are still a few points behind on damage.

    that was a quick look.

    #260194
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Pedro can you find some examples of where High Speed + 1 (High Strain +1) results in spells vastly superior to adapted spells?

    Elemental Bolt/Arc Lighting – 4 (+2) /4 (+2) –
    becomes 5 (+3)
    Melee (1 target)
    2d6 (Primary)+2

    to get Arc Lighting to do the same damage you need to apply the damage boost 3 times
    for CTN: +9, Strain +3 final cost of 4 (+5) and are still a few points behind on damage.

    that was a quick look.

    I’ll be honest, the CTN’s on adaptations are rather high compared to CTN for Advanced Spells. Otherwise, I don’t see a big issue with that, since the Improved Arc Lightning is still a Base Spell and could be combined with something still.

    John

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 42 total)
  • The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.