Makers of Award-winning Role Playing Games › Forums › Arcanis: The Shattered Empires › Arcanis: Rules & Rulings › Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion › Advanced Spell – Speed/Strain
- This topic has 41 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- March 20, 2014 at 8:10 pm #260352AnonymousInactive
Issue: What about spells that are gotten at higher tiers in some traditions than others? For example: Inferno is a Tier III Primal Elemental Spell, and a Tier IV val’Virdan/Emman spell.Use the tier associated with whatever tradition you are casting it from. If you happen to have both traditions, pick one.
Looking up at the advanced spells, I’m left to wonder how the original edit I proposed was so bad.. in almost every case it lowered the speed of the original combined spell.the only think it lacked was a slight increase in CTN (less then what I propose now)Personally, I didn’t have a problem with the original proposal. I’m just proposing a slightly outside the box solution to one of the more recent debates within this topic.

ScottMarch 20, 2014 at 8:16 pm #260354AnonymousInactiveI also found the errata to be perfectly acceptable.
March 20, 2014 at 8:42 pm #260360AnonymousInactiveLooking up at the advanced spells, I’m left to wonder how the original edit I proposed was so bad.. in almost every case it lowered the speed of the original combined spell.
the only think it lacked was a slight increase in CTN (less then what I propose now)
Besides that you could be forced to use two strain values or two speed values as both of the new values?As John pointed out, combining two very fast but exhaustive spells (low speed, high strain) meant the new spell having (high speed, high strain) every single time. Using the Martial Technique’s method, it should be possible to get a distribution of low, medium, and high for both values.
Plus, as was pointed out by someone else too, consistency between AMT and AS is a good thing.
March 20, 2014 at 8:51 pm #260363AnonymousInactiveLooking up at the advanced spells, I’m left to wonder how the original edit I proposed was so bad.. in almost every case it lowered the speed of the original combined spell.
the only think it lacked was a slight increase in CTN (less then what I propose now)
The main issue with the proposal was that it had no basis in realism. Again, the ‘general’ example was if you combine 2 very fast spells with high strain you end up with an interruptible spell with high strain. It made no sense. The numbers may come out the same when you have 2 spells with similar speed (strain) costs, but that doesn’t make the methods the same.
John
March 20, 2014 at 9:12 pm #260376AnonymousInactiveLooking up at the advanced spells, I’m left to wonder how the original edit I proposed was so bad.. in almost every case it lowered the speed of the original combined spell.
the only think it lacked was a slight increase in CTN (less then what I propose now)
Besides that you could be forced to use two strain values or two speed values as both of the new values?As John pointed out, combining two very fast but exhaustive spells (low speed, high strain) meant the new spell having (high speed, high strain) every single time. Using the Martial Technique’s method, it should be possible to get a distribution of low, medium, and high for both values.
Plus, as was pointed out by someone else too, consistency between AMT and AS is a good thing.
True, but of you look at the final values…across the board they were faster and in some cases only +1 strain over the original spell..
AWM also had the additional weapon speed cost added to the final numbers, a factor missing with spells.
Maybe use the AWM method + a modifier?
March 20, 2014 at 9:14 pm #260378AnonymousInactiveNot sure a modifier is needed. Spells don’t have a ‘modifier’ on their speed when cast as Base Spells. the “Speed” of the spell is basically the same as a Weapon Speed + maneuver modifier in many cases.
John
March 20, 2014 at 10:24 pm #260389AnonymousInactiveIf going with the A:MT method, no modifier is needed.
Recovery <> Strain for a penalty, and higher Strain overall is a GOOD thing for balance. The Strain in general is much higher for some spell combinations.While under Recovery, you can still use Base Attacks or a Manoeuvre without a Recovery (ie: continue the same attack mode).
While under Strain, you can’t do any other spell without dealing with the strain somehow, potential Vanquishing yourself. This would also help slow down Minion spellcasters (where there are dozens of the annoying **** throwing something like Black Tongue at you).March 20, 2014 at 11:13 pm #260394AnonymousInactiveLooking up at the advanced spells, I’m left to wonder how the original edit I proposed was so bad.. in almost every case it lowered the speed of the original combined spell.
the only think it lacked was a slight increase in CTN (less then what I propose now)
Spell Speed isn’t the issue; its the low strain value attached to them. If spellcasting is dominating tables, more strain = lower casting tempo and more varied attack methods.
March 21, 2014 at 2:45 am #260418AnonymousInactiveOk going with the A:MT speed/recovery system…
changed the CTN to Equal to the sum of both CTNs – 13
March 21, 2014 at 2:58 am #260423AnonymousInactiveOk going with the A:MT speed/recovery system…
changed the CTN to Equal to the sum of both CTNs – 13
Any chance to consider a scaling CTN based upon Tier?
Sum of CTN’s – 13 means a CTN of 29 when combining 2 Tier II CTN 21 spells. Not likely to be cast.
John
March 21, 2014 at 3:07 am #260425AnonymousInactivekeeping it at -15
March 21, 2014 at 3:14 am #260427AnonymousInactive:edit: just saw Pedro’s change of mind above.
Crunched the numbers on ‘average’ advanced spells and a CTN-13 pushes the numbers quite high.
‘Average’ Base CTNs
T1 CTN18 Arcanum +6, passive 21
T2 CTN20 Arcanum +10, passive 25
T3 CTN22 Arcanum +13, passive 29
T4 CTN24 Arcanum +16, passive 32
T5 CTN– Arcanum +20, passive 36Advanced spells (two from same tier)
xx CTN-13 CTN-14 CTN-15
T1 CTN23 CTN22 CTN21
T2 CTN27 CTN26 CTN25
T3 CTN31 CTN30 CTN29
T4 CTN35 CTN34 CTN33Hmmm… wasnt’ actually as bad as I thought, but CTN-13 may be a bit rough (as those numbers are at the END of the tier after at least five advancements; +3 skill, a Path and a stat boost).
- AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.