Makers of Award-winning Role Playing Games › Forums › Arcanis: The Shattered Empires › Arcanis: Rules & Rulings › Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion › Val Bloodline talent errata
- This topic has 57 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- March 18, 2014 at 7:41 pm #150970AnonymousInactive
All val bloodline talents of Tiers 2 or higher, gain the requirement of a val bloodline talent of one tier lower.
This is fine for T1-3 since T1-2 have two bloodline talents each and should cover most people. However, I massively dislike this requirement for T4-5 where the previous tiers only have a single choice of bloodline talent.
For instance, my primary is a Vel’Dellenov. I don’t see We Are One with Her Domain fitting the character but Primal Self is pretty central to the build. With this rules change, I would be forced to take We Are One with Her Domain regardless if it fits or not. For completeness, I also don’t see Nature’s Voice or Earth is my Ally fitting.
If you want to make sure people aren’t cherry-picking, how about switching the requirement to:
All val bloodline talents of Tiers 2 or higher, gain the requirement of a number of val bloodline talents of one lower than the tier.
That way, there are choices for everyone. In my case, I don’t like We are One with Her Domain but will have We are All Her Children, Hands of the Mother, and Form of the Predator (three bloodline talents – just not the T3 one).
March 18, 2014 at 7:46 pm #259732AnonymousInactivewhile your idea has merit I think it may end up confusing people (due to the fact that the system provided is unlike any other)
Story wise, your hero has little control over how their bloodline powers manifest.. the system we are proposing is much less stringent then the old system bloodline powers worked off of (requiring you to get all of the lower level bloodline powers)
Elorii are also forced, even in this system, to pick bloodline powers they may not like as they move up to the bloodline powers.
March 18, 2014 at 7:53 pm #259736AnonymousInactiveI can see how it might confuse people since it is different. Another perfectly viable option would be to (at a minimum) add one more Val bloodline talent for each family at T3 and T4 (I’d prefer 3 at each tier but 2 would at least give choices).
I will also admit I’d be much less opposed to this rule if it had been in the book originally. Adding it in now, it just feels like it’s forcing me to re-envision (and replan T3+) for my character.
March 18, 2014 at 8:31 pm #259756AnonymousInactiveJust a thought on this. Could we base it on Bloodrank? If the numbers add up right you can use Potent blood to effectively skip a tier of talent you don’t really like. In the end though i do think the best answer is just more options at each tier, which i’m sure will happen but takes time.
March 18, 2014 at 8:36 pm #259758AnonymousInactiveI see no issue with the rules as written, where you need at least one BL talent of a tier Lower to get the benefits of the higher ability. This way they are consistent with the Elorii Bloodline Talents, and (theoretically) the same as the Black Vals whenever they are released (unless they change things up). I see no mechanical reason why you shouldn’t have to get at least one Tier III to get a Tier IV. Just like any tiered effects, you sometimes have to take a lemon to get to the good stuff.
March 18, 2014 at 10:12 pm #259803AnonymousInactiveI see no issue with the rules as written, where you need at least one BL talent of a tier Lower to get the benefits of the higher ability. This way they are consistent with the Elorii Bloodline Talents, and (theoretically) the same as the Black Vals whenever they are released (unless they change things up). I see no mechanical reason why you shouldn’t have to get at least one Tier III to get a Tier IV. Just like any tiered effects, you sometimes have to take a lemon to get to the good stuff.
To me, Val bloodlines are different than Elorii bloodlines. Elorii have a single tiered talent whereas Val have multiple (usually) unrelated talents. I strongly feel that one of my two suggestions (either count of talents not directly related to tier or additional talents added at tier 3 and 4) needs to be implemented to allow some flexibility (either is still far more restrictive than what is currently in the rules of just cherry-picking whatever you want).
March 18, 2014 at 10:20 pm #259805AnonymousInactiveI must admit, before reading the Errata, I had assumed you needed the Lower Tier talent before getting the higher tier talent.
Story wise for me it makes sense that way. So I like the change
March 19, 2014 at 2:29 pm #259969AnonymousInactiveI also do not mind this requirement. I like the notion of having a power that is not predictable/obvious.
I’m looking forward to the time when walking from one tree to another is useful!
March 19, 2014 at 2:39 pm #259973AnonymousInactiverick anytime you walk into a tree its useful to the rest of your party, a concussed Decios is a quiet Decios
March 19, 2014 at 3:12 pm #259989AnonymousInactiveI’m starting to think “count of tier-1” (rather than “possess 1+ of tier-1”) is the way to handle all (or at least most) of these new restrictions. See Josh’s nearly identical suggestion for how to handle Learn Martial Technique. If all (or most) of them are handled in the same way (count) then this isn’t unusual/odd and won’t confuse people.
If this goes in as proposed, can we at least get a second bloodline talent for each family at T3 and T4 before anyone gets that far? As I’ve said, I don’t mind more restriction – I just majorly dislike the complete lack of choice with the proposed errata.
March 19, 2014 at 3:57 pm #260017AnonymousInactiveIf this goes in as proposed, can we at least get a second bloodline talent for each family at T3 and T4 before anyone gets that far? As I’ve said, I don’t mind more restriction – I just majorly dislike the complete lack of choice with the proposed errata.
that’s nothing new, spanning back to the d20 days…
sometimes to get to the uber stuff, you have to take the “not so uber” stuff
March 19, 2014 at 4:00 pm #260022AnonymousInactivethat’s nothing new, spanning back to the d20 days…
sometimes to get to the uber stuff, you have to take the “not so uber” stuff
I think this is a poor way to balance things. Requiring you take stuff you don’t want, won’t use and which doesn’t fit with your character is heavy handed. It only results in all characters of a val bloodline being identical.
There was a reason no one liked Feat Taxes and the like in d20

John
March 19, 2014 at 4:04 pm #260026AnonymousInactiverick anytime you walk into a tree its useful to the rest of your party, a concussed Decios is a quiet Decios
Dear Pickle,
As thick as his head is, it will take more than a bump from a tree trunk to concuss Decios.
March 19, 2014 at 4:08 pm #260027AnonymousInactiveI think I can no longer support this errata because you have referenced a Lady Gaga song.
March 19, 2014 at 7:09 pm #260110AnonymousInactivethat’s nothing new, spanning back to the d20 days…
sometimes to get to the uber stuff, you have to take the “not so uber” stuff
I have no issue with adding requirements to avoid cherry-picking. I just have major problems with “if you want this talent that fits your concept, you must take this specific one which doesn’t”. There should always be some level of choice on things like val bloodline. I still like my suggestion for a certain number of bloodline talents (rather than specific tier talent). If you like specific tiers then (IMNSHO) there needs to be more options at each tier (2 at a minimum which already exists for T1-2 but not T3-4).
- AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Proposed Errata/FAQ Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.