Viewing 5 posts - 61 through 65 (of 65 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #259147
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    can you then walk me through why you are so resistant to swapping that to a primary die instead of a static one

    I struggle to think of any spell that uses a static die instead of a primary one

    #259159
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    can you then walk me through why you are so resistant to swapping that to a primary die instead of a static one

    I struggle to think of any spell that uses a static die instead of a primary one

    I have rolled 42 points of damage on an exploding d10….

    42 points of healing + 42 points of damage.. blam!

    #259172
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry I said I’d keep out, but I had to comment.

    The probability of that happening is .001% or 1 time in 10,000. I hope we’re not going to be designing rules around the very very fringe cases?

    On the other end, 10% of the time you’re going to heal everyone for 1 damage.

    John

    #259176
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry I said I’d keep out, but I had to comment.

    The probability of that happening is .001% or 1 time in 10,000. I hope we’re not going to be designing rules around the very very fringe cases?

    On the other end, 10% of the time you’re going to heal everyone for 1 damage.

    K, fair enough….

    If it’s primary and we see it’s still crazy good…it’s not like I can’t change the errata

    #259201
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    (thanks john) Pedro i think you wont find that happening too often, the average for an exploding die compared to a non exploding die is less than 1/2…

Viewing 5 posts - 61 through 65 (of 65 total)
  • The forum ‘Harvesters Internal’ is closed to new topics and replies.